1. Home
  2. /
  3. Publication Ethics
International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

The International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science (IJIRMS) is committed to maintaining high standards of research integrity and responsible scholarly publishing. The journal expects authors, editors, reviewers, and other contributors to act with honesty, transparency, fairness, and respect throughout the publication process.

IJIRMS follows the principles and guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and considers the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and other recognized standards relevant to medical research and publishing.

Research Ethics

Research involving human participants, human data, or human biological material must comply with applicable ethical and regulatory requirements. Where required, appropriate approval from an institutional or independent ethics committee must be obtained before the study begins.

Research involving animals must comply with relevant institutional, national, and international standards for animal care and welfare.

Authors should report the relevant ethical approval information in the manuscript.

Protection of Human Subjects and Animals in Research

When reporting research involving human participants, authors must confirm that the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2024, and applicable institutional, national, and international ethical requirements. Appropriate ethics committee or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval must be obtained where required, and the relevant approval details should be reported in the manuscript.

Research involving animals must comply with applicable institutional, national, and international standards for animal care and welfare. Authors should provide details of ethical approval where applicable and follow the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines when reporting animal research.

Authors must ensure that research involving human participants, animals, biological materials, or identifiable data has been conducted responsibly and in accordance with all applicable ethical and regulatory requirements. Where required, evidence of ethical approval may be requested by the journal.

Informed Consent and Privacy

Appropriate informed consent must be obtained from research participants whenever required by the study design, applicable laws or regulations, or the relevant ethics committee/Institutional Review Board (IRB). Where informed consent is waived or not required, authors must clearly state the basis for the waiver or exemption.

Authors must protect the privacy, confidentiality, and dignity of patients and research participants. Identifiable information must not be published unless it is scientifically necessary and appropriate consent for publication has been obtained.

For case reports, clinical photographs, videos, genetic information, or any other potentially identifiable material, authors are responsible for obtaining appropriate consent for publication. Where consent cannot be obtained, the material must be sufficiently anonymized or publication should not proceed, unless an applicable ethics-approved waiver permits its use.

Obligation to Register Clinical Trials

IJIRMS requires the prospective registration of all applicable clinical trials in a publicly accessible clinical trial registry at or before the time of first participant consent or enrollment, in accordance with the current ICMJE Recommendations.

For this policy, a clinical trial is a research study that prospectively assigns participants to a health-related intervention, with or without a comparison or control group, to evaluate health outcomes. This includes interventions involving medicines, devices, surgical procedures, behavioural treatments, dietary interventions, and other health-related interventions.

IJIRMS accepts registration in WHO ICTRP primary registries or ClinicalTrials.gov, provided the registry meets the applicable ICMJE requirements. Ethics committee or institutional review board approval does not replace prospective clinical trial registration.

Authors must provide the registry name and trial registration number in the manuscript, preferably at the end of the abstract. Failure to prospectively register an applicable clinical trial may result in the manuscript being considered ineligible for publication. Exceptions, where justified, will be considered only in rare circumstances and must be adequately explained.

Data Sharing and Availability Policy

IJIRMS is committed to promoting transparency, reproducibility, and responsible sharing of research data. Authors must provide a Data Availability Statement with every manuscript, indicating whether the data supporting the reported findings are available and, where applicable, how and where they can be accessed.

Where ethically, legally, and practically possible, authors are encouraged to deposit supporting data, datasets, protocols, code, and other relevant research materials in a trusted and appropriate repository and provide a persistent link or DOI.

Where data cannot be publicly shared because of privacy, confidentiality, ethical, legal, contractual, or other legitimate restrictions, authors must clearly state the reason and describe the conditions under which the data may be accessed, where applicable.

For clinical trials, the Data Sharing Statement must comply with the current ICMJE Recommendations, including the applicable data-sharing plan in the trial registration.

Authors remain responsible for ensuring that shared data are accurate, appropriately documented, ethically obtained, and do not disclose identifiable participant information.

Authorship and Contributions

Authorship should be based on substantial intellectual contributions to the work. All listed authors must approve the final manuscript and accept responsibility for the integrity of the work.

Individuals who contributed to the work but do not meet the requirements for authorship should be appropriately acknowledged.

The journal does not permit guest, honorary, gift, or ghost authorship.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose financial and non-financial relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research, review, or editorial decision.

A competing-interest statement should be included with every manuscript, including a clear statement when no relevant competing interests exist.

Funding and Sponsor Role

All sources of financial support for the research and manuscript preparation must be disclosed.

Where applicable, authors should describe the role of the funding organization in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, and the decision to submit the work for publication.

Authors should retain appropriate access to the data necessary to verify the reported findings.

 

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are based on the scientific quality, originality, relevance, methodological rigor, ethical conduct, and clarity of submitted work. Decisions are not influenced by commercial interests, financial relationships, institutional affiliations, nationality, ethnicity, religion, gender, or other unrelated characteristics of authors.

Editors are expected to manage conflicts of interest and maintain independence throughout the editorial process.

Plagiarism and Duplicate Publication

IJIRMS does not accept plagiarism, self-plagiarism, substantial text recycling, duplicate publication, fabricated content, or inappropriate reuse of previously published material.

Submitted manuscripts may be screened for plagiarism or substantial overlap. Depending on the circumstances and severity, a manuscript may be rejected or further investigation may be undertaken.

If serious problems are identified after publication, appropriate post-publication action may be taken.

Research and Publication Misconduct

The journal considers fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, manipulation of research images or data, duplicate publication, citation manipulation, peer-review manipulation, authorship misconduct, undeclared conflicts of interest, and other forms of research or publication misconduct to be serious matters.

Where concerns arise, the journal may request clarification or supporting information from authors or relevant institutions and may take appropriate editorial action in accordance with established publication-ethics procedures.

Citation Ethics

Authors should cite literature that is directly relevant to their work and should ensure that references accurately support the statements for which they are cited.

Authors, editors, and reviewers must not request or encourage unnecessary citations for the purpose of increasing citation counts, journal metrics, or author metrics.

Peer Review Ethics

Peer review is conducted confidentially and objectively. Reviewers should assess manuscripts only within their area of expertise and should disclose any conflict of interest that could affect their assessment.

Reviewers must not use unpublished information obtained during peer review for personal or professional advantage and must not share confidential manuscript content with unauthorized persons.

Editors and reviewers should not use generative AI systems to process confidential manuscript material where confidentiality cannot be adequately protected.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy

The journal permits the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI technologies in research and manuscript preparation. Authors must disclose any substantive use of AI, including the tool and its purpose. Routine spelling, grammar, and language correction generally does not require disclosure.

AI tools must not be listed as authors. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, appropriate attribution, and plagiarism-free nature of all manuscript content, including AI-assisted content. AI must not be used to fabricate, falsify, or manipulate research data, results, images, references, or other scholarly content.

Editors and reviewers must maintain manuscript confidentiality and must not upload submitted manuscripts or confidential peer-review materials to AI systems where confidentiality cannot be assured. Any permitted AI use in peer review must be disclosed to the handling editor.

Undeclared or inappropriate AI use may constitute a breach of publication ethics and may result in appropriate editorial action.

Manuscripts Submitted by Editors or Editorial Board Members

Editors and Editorial Board members may submit manuscripts to IJIRMS. Such submissions are handled independently to avoid conflicts of interest.

The submitting editor or board member will not participate in the editorial decision, reviewer selection, or management of their own manuscript. The manuscript is evaluated through the journal's normal editorial and peer-review procedures.

Confidentiality

Information relating to submitted manuscripts, editorial correspondence, peer-review reports, and unpublished research is treated as confidential.

Editors, reviewers, and other individuals involved in the publication process must not disclose or use confidential information except as required for legitimate editorial, ethical, or legal purposes.

Ethical Oversight

Where a manuscript raises significant ethical or integrity concerns, IJIRMS may request additional documentation or clarification from the authors, their institution, ethics committee, funding body, or other appropriate authority.

The journal reserves the right to decline or withdraw consideration of work that does not meet applicable ethical and publication standards.

The Process for Handling Cases Requiring Corrections, Retractions, and Editorial Expressions of Concern

IJIRMS follows the current recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

We aim to ensure the integrity of the academic record of all published or potential publications. Whenever it is recognized that a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement, or distorted report has been published, it must be corrected promptly and with due prominence. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it should be retracted. The retraction should be clearly identifiable to readers and indexing systems.

Corrections

Errors in published papers may be identified in the form of a corrigendum or erratum when the Editor-in-Chief considers it appropriate to inform the journal readership about a previous error and makes a correction to the error in the published article. The corrigendum or erratum will appear as a new article in the journal, and will cite the original published article.

Retractions

Retractions are considered and published when there are severe errors in an article that invalidate the conclusions. Retractions are also made in cases where there is evidence of publication malpractice, such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, or unethical research.

According to industry best practice and in accordance with COPE guidelines, IJIRMS implements the following procedure if a retraction is confirmed:

  1. A retraction note titled “Retraction: [article title]” signed by the authors and/or the editor is published in a subsequent issue of the journal and listed in the contents list.
  2. In the electronic version, a link is made to the original article.
  3. The online article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note. It is to this screen that the link resolves; the reader can then proceed to the article itself.
  4. The original article is retained unchanged save for a watermark on the HTML and PDF indicating on each page that it has been “retracted.”

Editorial expressions of concern

Where substantial doubt arises as to the honesty or integrity of a submitted or published article, journal editors may consider issuing an expression of concern. However, expressions of concern should only be issued if an investigation into the problems relating to the article has proven inconclusive, and if there remain strong indicators that the concerns are valid.  Under some rare cases, an editorial expression of concern may also be issued when an investigation is underway but a judgement will not be available for a considerable time.

The expression of concern will be linked back to the published article it relates to.

 

Last updated: 13 August 2026